X380 Yoga Can’t See QMR Hotfix

I shoulda known. When MS unleashed it Quick Machine Recovery (QMR) capability earlier this week, it said it would  provide a test fix so IT admins could try out its automatic repair facility. I blogged about enablement instructions on Monday, and have been waiting for that fix since then. I just learned that MS is gradually rolling it out to Beta Channel Insiders running Build 26120.3671. But alas, my test PC is on the outside, looking in. Certain units should find the test fix under a new “Hotfix” category in Settings > Windows Update > Update History. To my chagrin, my test X380 Yoga can’t see QMR Hotfix (neither category nor test item), as (not) shown in the lead-in graphic.

X380 Yoga Can’t See QMR Hotfix: Wait for It!

Gradual rollouts are unpredictable as to when a feature might appear. But they are pretty reliable, in that it should appear sometime. One just has no idea when that might be. If you look at the lead-in graphic you’ll see that it lists out:

  • Feature Updates
  • Quality Updates
  • Driver Updates
  • Definition Updates
  • Other Updates

When the QMR-aimed Hotfix finally makes it to the X380, a new category named Hotfix will appear. Then, should I use the reagentc.exe /BootToRe instruction to reboot the PC and tell it to look for and apply same, that should show me by example what it looks like and how it works.

So far, nada!

Standing By for My Turn

As seems to happen to me more often than not, I’m going to have to exercise patience and make sure that I keep checking for the Hotfix category and its test item in the Update History on the X380. Don’t know when that might be, but I’ll report in when that happens. Stay tuned!

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin

Mapping Windows Memory Usage

I like to keep an eye on how Windows is using system resources. To that end, I still use Helmut Buhler’s excellent 8GadgetPack utilities. They don’t really tell you anything that Task Manager can’t but you can keep them in view all the time, and they don’t exact much system overhead, either. For a rough and ready picture of what’s up with Windows memory (RAM), those tools (e.g. Task Manager and the CPU Monitor gadget) can tell you how much RAM is on your PC, how much is in use, and how much is free. The gadget also reports page file info: total, free, used as well. But when it comes to digging deeper into how Windows uses memory, the Sysinternals tool for mapping Windows memory usage –namely, RamMap – is what you need. Let me explain…

For Mapping Windows Memory Usage, Try RamMap

If you look at the lead-in graphic, I’ve superimposed the CPU Usage gadget (aka CPU Monitor) at center far right, with the Sysinternals RamMap tool beneath it. This pretty much shows things as they work and contrasts the minimal level of detail available from Task Manager and the Corresponding CPU gadget to the more detailed and nuanced RamMap.

TLDR version: Use Task Manager or the CPU Gadget to get a gross overview of memory and paging file stuff; use RamMap to get more details about what’s consuming memory and what state that memory is in.

In large part differences are a matter of details. Task Manager and the CPU Gadget tell you how much RAM is used (blue numbers under the Used, Free, Total column heads in white: 23.6GB) and free (~8GB). It also tells you that the page file is not in use (yellow numbers right underneath RAM entries). That’s pretty much it.

RamMap, OTOH, provides a lot more memory status categories: Active, Standby, Modified, Modified No Wire, Transition, Zeroed, Free, and Bad (you want to see THAT one in a memory map). You get a much more informed and detailed view here (and under other tabs besides “Use Counts” in the leftmost position, shows by default).

How “Used” and “Free” Fit RamMap Categories

Here’s something worth knowing: Used Memory in Task Manager/CPU Gadget combines the RamMap totals under Active, Standby and Modified. Free memory in Task Manager/CPU Gagdet combines the RamMap totals under the Zero and Free headings.

But when RamMap runs you can also see how those numbers change as processes execute, tasks get handled, services do their thing and so forth. It’s much more detailed and useful if you want that level of detail, especially if you’re hunting a memory leak of some kind.

Good stuff! Grab yourself a copy today (or you can simply run the web-based executable, to make sure you’re always using the latest and greatest version).

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin

Command Palette Brings WinGet Wrinkles

OK, then. I’m having an absolute ball running the new v0.90 PowerToys Command Palette for all my everyday Windows tasks and upkeep. This morning, it’s a quick hop into CmdPal (as it’s commonly abbreviated in Windows Terminal or PowerShell discussions or documentation) to see how WinGet behaves. It works just fine, but Command Palette brings WinGet wrinkles that I had to experience to understand. Let me explain…

What Command Palette Brings WinGet Wrinkles Means

I’m used to running WinGet inside PowerShell. That means I get a lot of support from its inbuilt facilities, as well as those from the surrounding Windows Terminal environment. As far as I can tell right now, running WinGet from CmdPal lacks that support.

Thus, for example, when I type winget up, the command shell is smart enough to know that I’m probably going to want to run my all-time favorite winget upgrade command — namely:

winget upgrade –all –include-unknown

Indeed you can see that from the auto-complete function in PowerShell in lighter text if you examine the following screencap carefully. Note the cursor sits just to the right of “up” in that string. If I strike the right-arrow key it will enter the rest of the line for me.

When I enter strings into CmdPal, I don’t get the auto-complete function automatically. It may remember over time, but I’m just starting to use it so it has nothing to remember right now.

Also, when I hit the Enter key after typing out the full string shown above manually, it runs inside of the Command Prompt shell, not PowerShell. That means I have to approve installers via UAC (User Account Control) so they can run with a mouse click. Inside PowerShell, those installers run without requiring UAC approvals.

Right Now, I Prefer WinTerm/PS to CmdPal

I’m not yet aware if I can customize CmdPal to run commands in PowerShell rather than Command Prompt by default. Part of my confusion stems from CmdPal as a Windows Terminal facility that precedes the introduction of the utility of the same name via PowerToys. But hey, anything new comes with little wrinkles and niggling details in need of working out and understanding more fully.

But again, it’s a gas to use CmdPal. And I am having great fun working my way into what promises to be a terrific and capable tool. I just need to learn how to use it properly, and well.

 

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin

PowerToys v0.90 Adds Command Palette

Here it is! The March 31 release of PowerToys v0.90 adds Command Palette to the mix. As you can see in the lead-in graphic — from the MS Learn cover article — “The Command Palette is intended to be the successor of PowerToys Run.” And it’s dead easy to use with the default keyboard shortcut WinKey+Alt+Space. (Note: on US keyboards these three keys appear in sequence at bottom, left.)

PowerToys v0.90 Adds Command Palette:
Use It!

All you need to do to open the Command Palette is to type the shortcut. All you need to do to launch something, is to start typing its name. It’s able to search for applications, files and folders. It can run commands, provide simple calculations, add bookmarks, switch among open windows on the desktop (formerly known as “Windows Walker), and more.

I’m still figuring out how to use it effectively, but it provides ready access to anything you might access via the Start menu, Windows Terminal (and various command shells), and the Windows desktop itself. When you update to PowerToys version v0.90, it’s ready to go: just type Winkey+Alt+Space and you’ll see your starting point (aka the Command Palette home page):

Lots of customizations are apparently possible, but I haven’t gone there yet. I’m still having too much fun playing with Command Palette’s default capabilities. Check it out: you’ll have fun, too!

 

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin

Build 26120.3653 Gains QMR

In the latest 24H2 Beta Build for Windows 11, the OS gains a facility called Quick Machine Recovery. That’s right: Build 26120.3653 gains QMR, ready for test and use after install. Indeed, the lead-in graphic shows commands to set up a QMR test, as documented at MS Learn. (That entire article is worth a quick read for an overview and explanation of QMR’s cloud- and OS-based remediation capabilities).

Testing How Build 26120.3653 Gains QMR

On a suitably-equipped Windows 11 PC, QMR testing must first be enabled. The first of the two commands shown above handles that:

reagentc.exe /SetRecoveryTestMode

Next, you must instruct QMR to take over the PC after the next reboot. That forces QMR into action (otherwise, it kicks in only after some kind of error or boot failure):

reagentc.exe /BootToRe

This instructs the boot loader to hand the next boot over to the Window Recovery Environment. That’s WinRE, the “Re” in the command string at far right. Overall, reagentc.exe handles WinRE configuration and auto-recovery handling. It also lets admins direct recovery operations and customize WinRE images.

QMR Remediation

QMR’s magic comes from its automated ability that — in the words of the afore-linked MS Learn article — “enables the recovery of Windows devices when they encounter critical errors that prevent them from booting.” In fast, QMR can “…automatically search for remediations in the cloud and recover from widespread boot failures…”

FWIW, I see this new facility as a well-crafted Microsoft response to 2 major issues in 2024. First, there was a Microsoft security update (KB5034441) in January of that year, that rendered PCs with smaller UEFI partitions unable to boot. Second, a Crowdstrike update in July left PCs in a “boot loop” unable to start up at all. Both incidents reportedly affected 8M+ Windows PCs, but the latter caused business service interruptions lasting up to 4 days. Many of those PCs ran remotely, inaccessible without some “interesting” boot-strapping maneuvers involving KVM tools (and lots of cursewords, apparently).

Hopefully, QMR will make such debacles obsolete, and provide cloud-based mechanisms to inject remediation automatically as soon as fixes can be concocted. This could be a very good thing. It’s going to take a while before QMR goes mainstream (probably in 25H2) but it should make life easier for Windows admins everywhere.

One more thing: Sergey Tkachenko at WinAero reports “A test patch is expected to be released in the coming days, which will allow you to test the Fast System Restore feature in practice.” That will let admins try out the auto-remediation feature for real.

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin

Unintended OneDrive Consequences

I have  to chuckle. Working on a Windows 11 revision to a data recovery  story yesterday, I ran into “the law of unintended consequences.” In this case, I switched OneDrive backup on to test the Windows Backup app. In so doing, I picked up some unintended OneDrive consequences. You can see them in the lead-in screenshot.

Overcoming Unintended OneDrive Consequences

Blithely, I started using files for my primary MSA from OneDrive on that test PC. (I chose the snappy and powerful ThinkStation P360 Ultra.) Immediately, it picked up Windows Terminal environment settings from the cloud, not the local PC.

Check the lead-in graphic. The error results from running the cloud-based PowerShell profile. It references supporting infrastructure for the WinGet.CommandNotFound capability. This allows WinGet to suggest a source to install a command that

(a) PowerShell sees as undefined
(b) WinGet recognizes
(c) knows where to find
(d) can install on the user’s behalf

Read the error message beneath the failed import command at Line 8 in that output stream. You’ll see the module named Microsoft.WinGet.Client is not loaded. Translation: that module IS squared away on PC from which  OneDrive supplies shared files.If it gets loaded on this machine, the error won’t recur.

Putting the (Right) Pieces in Place

The next screencap shows what I did to fix this. I looked up the instructions to get Microsoft.Winget.Client loaded. It requires two back-to-back PowerShell commands. The first handles install, the the second import:

Install-Module -Name Microsoft.WinGet.Client
Import-Module -Name Microsoft.WinGet.Client

I ran those commands  on the P350 Ultra. Where requested, I provided permission to access the module gallery for the client module. Next, PowerShell said”Restart Windows Terminal.” After I did that everything worked OK. Here’s visual proof:

What you see is that PowerShell opens normally, with no error messages. Next, you see NeoFetch which shows system and OS info for some nice eye candy. But that last part is proof that unknown command handling is working as it should. I typed ‘vim‘ in at the command line (it’s a well-known text editor popular in UNIX and Linux circles, not installed by default in PowerShell). And you see the results of the Microsoft.CommandNotFound module suggesting WinGet syntax for how to install this tool if wanted.

Problem solved!

 

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin

4TB SSDs Deliver 5-cent Storage GBs

On Tuesday, Tom’s Hardware dropped an eye-catching story. It’s entitled (in part) “4TB SSDs now 5 cents per GB…” It got me to thinking about the price trajectory of digital storage, over my three-plus decades working in computing. Today, 4TB SSDs deliver 5-cent storage GBs (e.g. Silicon Power UD90 for US$204: do the math).

I bought my first SCSI external hard disk for a Macintosh SE in the mid-1980s. It was an IOmega 300 MB model, and it cost me almost exactly US$1,000.00, or US$3.33 per megabyte. If you translate that into cost-per-GB that becomes US$3,409.92. If I’ve got the conversion factors right that means 1 GB of middling-fast NVMe SSD storage today costs just over 68,000 times LESS than it did in 1987 or thereabouts. Wow!

If 4TB SSDs Deliver 5-cent Storage GBs,
Why Not Buy Some?

At least, that’s what I’m thinking. Except for those users who’ve purchased Thunderbolt 5 capable systems that can support TB5 storage peripherals, SSDs like those in the afore-linked Tom’s story are perfectly adequate for USB-attached storage devices. I can remember paying as much, or more, for 256 and 512 GB devices, and ditto for 1 TB and 2 TB devices, back when each size represented the top of the max space distribution then available.

Indeed, I’m thinking about acquiring a NAS like the QNAP TBS-464 NASbook just to take such drives for a spin. Sometimes, it’s hard to appreciate how the price of technology has declined so dramatically, while speed and capacity have gone the other way. But this morning, I feel like it punched me in the nose — but in a good way. Cheers!

 

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin

Windows 11 25H2 Rumors Aswirl

OK, then: there’s a growing chorus of sources predicting a new version of Windows 11 for the second half of this year, most likely in the fall. And indeed there are lots of Windows 11 25H2 rumors aswirl at the moment including: Windows Latest, Windows Central, Thurrott.com, and more. Indeed, MS has just bumped up Windows version numbering the Dev Channel to 262xx, and Windows watchers everywhere are seeing a new iteration in the offing this fall as a result.

With Windows 11 25H2 Rumors Aswirl, Here’s My Take

Given Microsoft’s annual cadence for Windows 11 updates at present, it’s no great leap of faith to see a new version coming later this year. It’s not at all unreasonable to posit from the recent change in Dev Channel build numbers that this may be the first tangible sign of what lies ahead.

Here’s my question, though: why is this hitting the Dev Channel, and not the Canary Channel? I’m a little confused as to the order and precedence among the Windows Insider channels right now (and I’m not the only one: Paul Thurrot’s afore-linked meditation on Windows in 2025 spends some cycles on wondering some of the same things).

I, too, find it challenging to keep up with 23H2 and 24H2 versions across production/GA releases, plus Canary, Dev, Beta and Release Preview channels. It seems like the Windows desktop is fracturing with lots of loosely connected box canyons that share no clear or common flow. If “a river runs through it,” it’s kinda muddy right now.

Is There Hope of Clarity or Simplification?

Going forward, I’d really like to see the number of separate tracks and trails diminish. It’s hard to keep a mental map of what’s changed where, and how things work in general and specific terms. That’s mostly because there are at least 10 different paths through Windows 11 versions right now, with no clear end to any of them in sight. Presumably, 23H2 needs to fall out sometime, but when?

Inquiring minds — including mine — would like some clarity, please. A road map would be no bad thing, either. Please help, Windows Insider team. It’s getting kinda crazy in here…

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin

ThinkPad T14s Thunderbolt Mystery Resolved

OK, then: poking around on the Lenovo eval unit I just got a couple of weeks ago, I’ve realized that this make/model is NOT a Copilot+ PC. Thus, it’s lacking in advanced AI support features by virtue of its relative age. Turns out the Intel Core Ultra5 125U is a Meteor Lake CPU, and although its NPU delivers 40 TOPS, it still doesn’t qualify as a Copilot+ unit. Thus, my ThinkPad T14s Thunderbolt mystery resolved itself also. The CPU dates back to late 2023, before the Thunderbolt Share license program started up.

OK: ThinkPad T14s Thunderbolt Mystery Resolved NOPE!

Copilot mentions checking the user manual as one way to ascertain if Thunderbolt Share is supported on a ThinkPad model. So I just downloaded that PDF, and scanned it for all “Thunderbolt” references. Sure enough: nowhere is Thunderbolt Share mentioned. Given that none of the marketing materials for the unit mentions Thunderbolt Share, either, I’m inclined to posit that such support is absent.

Go figure! When I asked Lenovo to send me another review unit, I’d requested one with Thunderbolt Share capability. But hey: you don’t always get what you ask for on the first try. Time to try again, methinks…

Careful What You Wish For…

My issue probably means I didn’t communicate well with the reviews team. I think I know how to fix that. I’ll pack this unit up and send it back, then specify a definite CPU make and model (or higher). I believe if I ask for a Snapdragon X model, that will probably cover all the bases needed. Let me try that, and see what happens. Stay tuned: I’ll report back.

Note added March 26 (1 day later): I did hear from a Lenovo SME, who confirmed that neither the ThinkPad P16 Gen 1 Mobile Workstation nor the ThinkPad T14s Gen 5 hold a license for Intel’s Thunderbolt Share. I saw a strong hint of that in the software’s behavior, for sure, but it’s now confirmed: that little man isn’t there.

 

 

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin

Thunderbolt Share Gets Interesting

OK, then. I asked Lenovo to send me another Thunderbolt 4 capable laptop so I could try out the new Intel Thunderbolt Share app. Looks like I’m at least temporarily stymied, and have learned some things I don’t especially like, either. Indeed, Thunderbolt Share gets interesting from the get-go possibly because of licensing issues. Right now, I’m stymied because when I run a TB4 cable between my 2 TB-equipped laptops right now, I can never get past the “Waiting for connection” screen shown above. Sigh.

Thunderbolt Share Gets Interesting Because…?

Notice the disclaimers beneath “Connect both Computers” in the foregoing screencap. I may be stuck on the clause that reads:

At least one PC or Thunderbolt accessory must be Thunderbolt Share licensed by the manufacturer

From what I can tell, the newest of my pair of PCs — the only one that could possibly qualify here — had its Windows image burned on November 20, 2024. Given that Thunderbolt Share made its debut in May of the same year, it’s entirely possible that Lenovo didn’t license this program for the ThinkPad T14s Gen5. At any rate it’s not working between my only TB4-capable laptops right now. I’ve asked Lenovo for help, and we’ll see what happens. But there’s more…

Thunderbolt Share Won’t Open in RDP Session

My usual way of working on test and eval PCs is to RDP using  Remote Desktop Connection (mstsc.exe) on my primary desktop. That’s what I tried first to get into Thunderbolt Share on the two target machines. Guess what? Thunderbolt Share won’t launch from inside an RDP session. I have to physically use the target PCs to get the app to run. I have to laugh…

Once launched,  it keeps running if I then remote into either the P16 or the T14s. But of course, it’s stuck at “Waiting for connection” right now. So I’m getting nowhere, fast. That means my plans to compare TB4 cable transfer speeds against GbE and Wi-Fi transfers are on hold for now. Stay tuned. I hope to get this straightened out soon.

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin

Author, Editor, Expert Witness