Category Archives: Hardware Reviews

We are constantly getting a wide variety of hardware and software to test and exercise under a range of conditions. As you might expect, some work better than others, some play nicely with others (or not), and a few are genuinely pleasant surprises. Here you’ll find a collection of reviews on a range of products. We’ll be updating this section frequently as we run across new stuff, so come back soon and often!

Cool Tools, Hardware Reviews, Insider stuff, Recent Activity, WED Blog, Windows 11

OCuLink versus Thunderbolt

Leave a comment

I just learned something new (to me, anyway). In reading about a mini-PC at Neowin today, I ran across mention of an OCuLink port. It looks alot like DisplayPort (full-sized) but it’s not. As Sydney Butler at How-to Geek explains things “OCuLink…[is] short for ‘Optical-Copper Link,’ [and] is a peripheral connection standard that allows you to connect PCIe devices using an external cable rather than an internal slot.” Thus, it uses raw PCIe signaling instead of protocol based channel communications, which makes it faster and cheaper than Thunderbolt 4 (but not 5. where it’s cheaper but slower).

Why Compare OCuLink versus Thunderbolt?

OCuLink can do many of the same things that Thunderbolt does — notably make fast NVMe and eGPU connections — often more cheaply. It can handle external GPUs (eGPUs) faster than TB4 (not TB5), and at lower cost.

OCuLink is not as widely used in laptops, however, and depends on a PCIe (X4 or X8 usually) adapter to make such ports available for use. A new standard, called CopperLink, is on the way to support PCIe 5.0 and 6.0 (and compete directly with TB5). Indeed you can even buy an OCuLink eGPU dock with dual OCuLink and TB5 ports, an M.2 NVMe SSD slot, 2.5Gbe (RJ-45), and even dual USB 3.0 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) ports for US$240. That’s about half the price of a TB5 dock (e.g. CalDigit, Anker, Lenovo, etc.) nowadays…

Does Slow Thunderbolt Uptake Open a Door?

A good TB4 enclosure costs upward of US$60 these days, and includes a cable. A good TB5 enclosures costs upward of US$150 and includes a cable. A decent OCuLink enclosure costs US$40 or so, but needs a US$20-40 cable to work. It runs faster than TB4 but slower than TB5. The same general scenario applies to running external GPUs: here again, OCuLink falls between TB4 and TB5.

For desktop and mini-PC users with access to open PCIe X4 slots, OCuLink is worth considering. Laptop and tablet owners will probably opt for TB4 because that’s what the majority of OEMs support nowadays. In the future, it’ll be interesting to see if CopperLink gains traction at the expense of TB5. It’s an Open Standard, so OEMs don’t have to pay to license the technology for inclusion in their devices. On such small factors big decisions sometimes rest here in Windows-World. Let’s see what happens!

 

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin
Copilot+ PCs, Hardware Reviews, Insider stuff, Recent Activity, WED Blog

Undisappearing X13 Gen 6 PING

Leave a comment

I’m getting ready to return the sweet little review unit Lenovo sent me six weeks ago. It’s a ThinkPad X13 Gen 6 (see First Look from November 7). It’s endowed with an Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, 16GB RAM, and an 0.5 GB NVMe SSD. For size and heft, it’s a nominal 13″ ultra-portable (933g/2.05 lbs) that’s easy to pack up and take with you wherever you go. As I was preparing a final once-over, I found myself faced with undisappearing X13 Gen 6 PING. Let me explain…

Why I’m Undisappearing  X13 Gen 6 PING

For some odd reason, Lenovo instituted firewall rules on this eval unit that I’ve never run into before. You can see them in the lead-in graphic where they show — in brief — that for both Private and Domain LAN namespaces, inbound PING is disabled for both IPv4 and IPv6. That means this PC won’t respond to incoming PING requests from the LAN. Sigh.

That’s how Advanced IP Scanner finds PCs (among other techniques). It also explains why IPconfig on the X13 Gen 6 happily reported itself at a private IP address, but didn’t show up in the scans that tool made on my desktop. Sigh again.

This is easily fixed by changing those firewall rules to enable (YES) them, instead of disabling (NO) same. But I wonder: why did Lenovo do this? I can see this applying to boundary devices (e.g. firewalls) and servers, but haven’t really run into it much on end-user PCs. They’s usually safe behind one or more layers of external protection (2 in my case), and don’t get external PINGs. Maybe it’s a “coffee shop” scenario…? But PING is disabled on Public networks anyway. Go figure!

Closing Thoughts on the X13 Gen 6 ThinkPad

As I get ready to box this unit up, and ship it off, I’ve come to some conclusions. On the plus side, it’s light, compact and reasonably capable. I’d be inclined to upgrade the 0.5 GB SSD to 1.0 GB or bigger (with budget 2.0 GB units selling for under US$100 right now, that’s not a big stretch). Otherwise, it’s more than acceptable as-is.

On the minus side, the X13 is a little behind the curve technology wise. Alas,  this model is NOT Copilot+ capable. With its price now over US$1,500 (+US$8.45 at Best Buy, +US$138.22 at Staples) it’s nowhere near as good a deal as a lightweight Snapdragon X-equipped model in that general price range (e.g. Lenovo ThinkPad 7X or Asus Zenbook A14).

Such models usually come equipped with 1 TB SSDs from the get-go, offer better battery life (12+ hours for SnapdragonX models vs. 7-10 hours for the X13), and are on par or better for performance and capability. That said, ARM PCs still have their Windows quirks and limitations, too. Here in Windows-World choosing a laptop always involves certain trade-offs, eh? I’ve come down on the Copilot+ side of things, and remain amazed that less than 2% of new PC purchased globally qualify as such. Given MS’s emphasis on AI, why buy anything else?

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin
Copilot+ PCs, Hardware Reviews, Insider stuff, Recent Activity, WED Blog, Windows 11

ASUS A14 Zenbook Travelogue

Leave a comment

From December 7 to 16, my wife and I drove to California to pick up son Gregory upon moving out of his dorm on the 11th. For this 10-day odyssey, we took the new Snapdragon X laptop along. This blog post provides a kind of technical ASUS A14 Zenbook travelogue, as we used that machine in the car, and in 7 hotels on our trip. TLDR version: works well, great battery life, and easy to pack and tote. That said, everybody noticed — and missed — touch screen support.

Snippets from ASUS A14 Zenbook Travelogue

Day 1 (Home to Las Cruces, NM): Unbelievably fast Windows Hello facial recognition. Used less than 15% of battery with Kindle Reader in 4-6 hours in the car. Tried to drive interface with finger on screen only to realize this otherwise excellent US$550 lapop does NOT include a touchscreen. No issues using hotel Wi-Fi.

Day  2 (Las Cruces to Phoenix, AZ):  Took less than an hour to fully recharge PC after extended use in car for reading. No 5G support meant I used my iPhone as a wireless hotspot for Internet access in the car. No issues using hotel Wi-Fi, except I had to run thru the hotspot to grab my Hyatt loyalty club info before I could get free, high-perf access. Sigh: it’s always something…

Days 3 – 6 (Los Angeles/Hollywood, CA): Wife Dina and I made regular use of the A14 in the Loews Hollywood Hotel. Easy Wi-Fi access, decent performance for the lo-fi connection (until I figured out we got high-fi because of our room deal). Only had to charge the laptop once during our entire stay. Great battery life!

Into LA, Then Back Home

Day 7 (Hollywood to Bakersfield): The family indulged my burning desire to visit Cafe Pyrenees and tackle more food than you can believe is included in a “dinner setup” (costs US$24.95 by itself). The garlic fried chicken was astounding, and the A14 likewise, with easy Wi-Fi hookups and great web performance.

Day 8 (Bakersfield to Kingman, AZ): The Holiday Inn Express was a big disappointment. The A14 was not: another day of great battery life, easy Wi-Fi hookup, good Web-based Outlook access and performance, and more. I’m now completely comfortable claiming that for light-duty computing (e.g. email, surfing, basic apps and applications) this laptop can run for a long day (12 hours) on battery. Just in case, though, I brought a RavPower RP-PB41 on the trip (its 26,800 mAh capacity can charge the A14 to 100% in about 7 hours: it’s slow because it outputs 5A where the A14 expects 4X that level).

Day 9 (Kingman to Big Spring, TX): We doubled up the driving for a 12-hour day on Dec 15 (we’d originally planned to stop in Albuquerque, NM). The A14 ran all day during our 12:15 drive, with about 17% battery remaining when we pulled into the beautifully restored Hotel Settles around midnight that day. Phew!

Day 10 (Big Spring to Round Rock, TX): The ~5hr drive home drew only about 25% of battery capacity, as I surfed and looked at the 1,015 email messages waiting for me in my inbox at the Webmail server for edtittel.com. I knew the next would be busy as I chewed through that imposing list, to filter the wheat from the chaff.

Final Thoughts and Concerns

Gosh! I’m hard-pressing to ding the A14 for much at all, except for its lack of touchscreen support. Copilot tells me that such capability adds US$75-150 to the cost of a laptop, but I didn’t really stop to check if that was an available option or not when I jumped on its Best Buy Black Friday pricing. As Copilot would have it, buying a touchscreen A14 model would add anywhere from US$259 to US$500 to the US$550 I paid for my current unit at Best Buy. So much for Copilot’s obviously optimistic US$75-150 incremental cost estimate, eh?

All in all, I find this laptop to be eminently suited for mobile, portable use — as long as you have a cellphone that can provide a mobile Internet hookup. Alas, ASUS does not offer an in-PC M.2 slot into which one might insert a 5G card. So it goes, here in Windows-World. Net results: mostly positive, with only a couple of niggles. Love this new laptop: will keep using it as a road machine.

 

 

 

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin
Hardware Reviews, Insider stuff, Recent Activity, WED Blog, Windows 11

ASUS Zenbook A14 Intake

2 Comments

In hopes of bootstrapping one ARM laptop to another, I decided to acquire another Snapdragon-based machine this weekend. Thanks to an early “Black Friday” deal I picked up such a machine for under US$600. Here’s the story of my ASUS Zenbook A14 intake, with extra observations about the OOBE (out of box experience) during initial set-up.

Working Thru ASUS Zenbook A14 Intake

Except for the shrinkwrap around the inner box, the packaging for the A14 was all paper: environmentally friendly, for sure. I got to the OOBE by plugging in the brick, inserting the power lead into one of the USB-C ports, and turning on the power. Interestingly, even though the battery showed fully charged when checked, I had to plug the brick in and power up before the unit would turn on.

This unit is incredibly light: 2.18 lbs (990 grams). It’s also got a ceramal, aka ceraluminum, (ceramic aluminum alloy) skin that is strong and fingerprint indifferent. Mine came in a neutral gray color called “Iceland Gray” (shown on the keyboard deck in the lead-in graphic). It’s a tasty machine, with a nice bright display, a decent keyboard and great battery life (real world analyses claim 15 hours for web browsing, and 23 hours for video playback at 50% brightness). It’s completely on par with the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X I blogged about last July, in fact.

Speeds, Accoutrement & Feeds

Speccy couldn’t tell me much about this PC, so I turned to the ARM version of HWiNFO instead. Here’s what it told me:

  • CPU: SnapdragonX Plus X1P-42-100 (8 cores)
  • RAM: Single module 16GB LPDDR5X 8448 MHz
  • Storage: Crucial MTFDKBA512QGN-1BN1AABGA 512GB
  • Display: Samsung SDC420D (10x30cm, 1920x1200px)
  • Ports: 2xUSB-C 40 Gbps, 1xUSB-A 10 Gbps, HDMI 3.1, 3.5mm audio
  • Wi-Fi; Qualcomm FastConnect Wi-Fi 6E Dual Band
  • OS: Windows 11 Home (I immediately upgraded to Pro so I could use Remote Desktop Connection over the LAN for access)

I wouldn’t call this a truly powerful laptop, but I’m comfortable with its performance and capabilities, especially in view of its extended battery life. If I can switch out the SSD without losing my mind, I may bump it up to 2 or 4 TB instead of its current 0.5 TB level. Everything else seems adequate and usable.

The Real Reason I Bought This…

I’ve been trying to resuscitate my ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 (my “other ARM laptop,” on loan from Lenovo). I hadn’t been able to build recovery media on x64 Intel or AMD PCs to bring the T14s back to life through alternate boot via UFD. By building the Lenovo Recovery Media on that machine for the T14s, I was able to reinstall and recover that machine in working order on my next try. As compared to the day-and-a-half or so I spent trying to use MCT, Ventoy and Rufus to build bootable ARM media, it was a  cakewalk.

Here in Windows-World, incredible contortions may sometimes be needed to bring a dead laptop back to life. So it was with the ARM-based ThinkPad T14s, which roared back into action after I put the A14 to work building recovery media. Go figure!

 

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin
Hardware Reviews, Insider stuff, Recent Activity, WED Blog, Windows 11

ThinkPad X13 Gen 6 First Look

2 Comments

Although it showed up two weeks ago, yesterday was the first day I had open enough to unbox and bring up a brand-new ThinkPad. It’s a svelte (thin-and-light, in fact) 13″ laptop with an Intel Core Ultra 7 255U CPU, 16 GB RAM, Hello-capable IR camera and fingerprint reader, WUXGA (1920×1200) IPS 13″ display, and 512 GB PCIe x4 NVMe SSD. As configured, the Lenovo Store price for this unit is $1,269.33 this morning. As the ThinkPad X13 Gen 6 first look gets underway, I’m looking for answers to these questions:

1. Is this a Copilot+ PC?
2. What kinds of users is the X13 best suited for?
3. How does the unit perform on basic tasks? more demanding ones?

Digging in For a ThinkPad X13 Gen 6 First Look

Let’s answer those questions:

Copilot+ PC Status

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255U does have an NPU but it delivers only 12 TOPS. Copilot+ requirements call for 40 TOPS. So no, the X13 Gen 6 is NOT a Copilot+ capable PC. That’s not shocking — right now only about 1 in 50 laptops sold globally is Copilot+ capable (Copilot says it’s 1.9% of global PC sales, and 2.3% of Windows PC sales).

Who’s the Target Audience?

Based on the unit’s size, weight and configuration it’s an entry to mid-level laptop, designed for portability over power and capability. With a smallish 13″ screen, overall dimensions of 29.93 x 20.7 x 0.99-1.78cm / 11.78 x 8.15 x 0.39-0.7″, and a weight of merely 2.03 lbs (0.92 kg) it’s clearly a grab-and-go unit from start to finish. To me, that aims it squarely at an audience that needs computing mostly on the go, but not a whole lot of it.

IMO, that means this laptop aims at students, mobile office workers, and SOHO workers who need to pick up and carry it around rather than sitting always at the same desk. OTOH, this makes it an excellent “road machine” for users who want to carry something light and compact when they travel, but who may not use this laptop as their primary work PC.

Task Performance

Given its relatively modest processing, storage and memory endowments, the X13 Gen 6 configuration I examined — and the whole product line, in fact — aims to support users who want to surf the web, read e-mail, and handle routine productivity, media, and entertainment workloads. I wouldn’t recommend it to those who need to run large or demanding workloads including serious programming, local AI models or other big datasets, or heavy-duty 3-D graphics (which knocks it out of consideration for media, gaming, CAD/CAM, and so forth). If you want more performance nuts-n-bolts see this July 2025 review at Gigazine.

The built-in NVMe is a Lenovo model RPETJ512MMW1MDQ (M.2 22380 with Gen3/Gen4 level performance. It’s reasonably quick, but nowhere near state of the art. The unit relies on a built-in Intel graphic processor in the Xe-LPG family. It’s designed to run on par with entry-level discrete GPUs, and thus, to handle light gaming, media editing and AI workloads. Squares entirely with my subjective impression in watching YouTube, installing and using apps, and bringing the PC current with WU.

Initial Impressions: Nifty, Not Gnarly

The unit itself is incredibly light, but feels sturdy and looks good. I didn’t feel much flex in the keyboard or monitor decks as I picked it up and moved it around. The Windows Hello capable IR camera and fingerprint reader are both fast and easy to set up. Amusingly, I found it difficult to switch from my primary MSA to other accounts at login after I’d set the camera up, because it would log me in faster than I could click the lower-left icon for an alternate account at startup.

I couldn’t log into my ASUS AX-6000 802.11ax router on the 5GHz channel for some reason or another. The unit’s Wi-Fi6E Intel worked just fine with the 2.4 GHz channel, and performed well as I downloaded and installed a raft of updates and software apps.

The X13 has 2 USB-C ports, one of which goes to power unless you dock it up and get power that way. Both are USB4/Thunderbolt 4 capable. It also has 2 USB A 3.2 Gen 1 (5 Gbps) ports as well, along with HDMI 2.1 and 3.5mm audio (mini-RCA jack). It’s not overly endowed with ports, but they are sufficient for ordinary users’ needs.

First Look Takeaways…

Overall, this is an eminently portable and usable light-duty laptop. I’d buy one for my about-to-graduate college offspring, except I opted to spend $450 less to buy him the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X Copilot+ laptop in May. It lacks USB-A and headphone jack, but offers longer battery life and better AI capabilities.

 

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin
Hardware Reviews, Insider stuff, Recent Activity, WED Blog, Windows 11

ThinkStation P3 Ultra SFF G2 Intake

Leave a comment

A couple of weeks ago, the nice folks at Lenovo Reviews contacted me by email. “How would you like to try out the newest ThinkStation P3?” they asked. I already had the first generation model in house, so I boxed it up and sent it back. A few days later the new model arrived, and I got going on ThinkStation P3 Ultra SFF G2 intake. Here’s what I’ve learned so far…

Working Thru ThinkStation P3 Ultra SFF G2 Intake

At first glance, there’s no obvious difference between the Gen1 and Gen 2 models in this series. But I show the back of the unit because it’s immediately obvious that Lenovo made some substantial changes there. Let me list them out:

  • Went from side-by-side 2.5 GbE & 1 GbE RJ-45 ports to a single 1 GbE port
  • Switched from 8 mini-DP ports for video to 3 full-size + 4 mini DP ports
  • Changed the interior layout so it’s even simpler to switch out SSDs and RAM modules without using (too many, or any) tools

Of course, as you’d expect the innards got a bit of a facelift in climbing the generational ladder. That said, this compact workstation, while powerful, is NOT a Copilot+ PC. Here’s a list of key components:

  • Intel Core Ultra 9 285 (Arrow Lake, 8 P & 16 E cores: 24 total)
  • 64 GB (2×32) DDR5-5600 RAM
  • Graphics: Intel Arc Xe-LPG & RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation NVIDIA GPU (20 GB RAM)
  • Single 1 TB Samsung OEM SSD, to which I added a Samsung 950 EVO 4TB SSD (Higher speed options, including 10 GbE, available)
  • Wi-Fi: Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 2×2 BE vPro & Bluetooth 5.4
  • Ports: 2x USB-C/USB4/TB4 (front), 1x rear (top left, next to Wi-Fi antenna port), 2x USB 2 Type-A (mouse & keyboard), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) Type-A
  • Power goes to a 300W external brick (far right, top row)

As configured, the unit comes with an MSRP of $3,915. As per typical ongoing Lenovo discounts, it will cost you $3,054 at the Lenovo store. The unit is new enough that third-party resellers — and different prices — are not yet widely available.

Doing the Intake Thing

It was absurdly easy to remove the 2nd SSD from the old Gen 1 instance and install it into the Gen2. Took less than 2 minutes all told. I’ve not yet tried my 96 GB memory kit on the machine, though (Gen 2, like Gen 1, maxes out at 128 GB RAM). Getting the machine up to snuff has been a pleasure: it’s every bit as fast and powerful as its predecessor. So far, I’m loving working this beast, just as I enjoyed the older model.

Make no mistake: even though this PC is not Copilot+ capable, it’s still a powerful albeit compact (SFF means “small form factor” after all) PC. It can drive lots of monitors, handle lots of intense demanding work, and do those jobs with ease and panache. A worthy successor to the Gen 1, the Gen 2 is a kick-butt little workstation.

 

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin
Hardware Reviews, Insider stuff, Recent Activity, WED Blog, Windows 11

DIMM and Dimmer: My Memory Misorder

Leave a comment

It’s been bothering me for the past couple of weeks. I ordered a pair of memory modules to bump up RAM in the Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra. I used the same part number for what’s installed, thinking that it would guarantee a perfect replacement/addition. So wrong! I just happened to glance at the package the modules arrived in and saw something serious. Doh! It’s a case of DIMM and Dimmer — my memory misorder completely explains everything. Take a look…

Why I’m DIMM and Dimmer: My Memory Misorder

The upper left corner of the package says it all: 96GB kit. I thought I was ordering a 64GB kit and got a 96 instead. No wonder the P3 Ultra wouldn’t POST with those modules in place! Its max RAM capacity is 128GB. With 64 GB already installed, adding 96 takes the total to 160GB, or 32 GB over the top.

I have to laugh. If I take both existing modules out, I can get a 32 GB bump anyway. Or if I replace the too-big modules with what I should’ve gotten in the first place, I can get up to 128 GB, just like I’ve got on my Flo6 desktop.

I’ll have to think about this for a while. In the meantime, I’m laughing at my own idiotic failure to doublecheck what I wanted against what I got delivered to me. Just because I used the same part numbers to place my order doesn’t mean that’s what I got back. Go figure!

Here in Windows-World, things aren’t always as they seem. And sometimes that’s because yours truly isn’t paying enough attention to what’s right there in front of him. Sigh. But at least I now know why the PC wouldn’t POST with all four modules in place. That had been driving me ever so slightly bonkers…

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin
Hardware Reviews, Insider stuff, Recent Activity, WED Blog

P3 Ultra Shows Amazing Interior Design

Leave a comment

Yesterday, I upgraded the Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra with mixed success. I was able to install and use a Samsung 990 EVO Plus NVMe SSD 4TB. I tried to boot after installing a pair of G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR5 32GB SO-DIMMs. Alas, the PC wouldn’t POST, so I had to send them back. I’ve ordered a pair of matching SK Hynix HMCG88AGBSA095N modules instead, and hopefully they’ll work when I stick them in next week. Throughout this in-and-out process, however the P3 Ultra shows amazing interior design. Let me explain…

How P3 Ultra Shows Amazing Interior Design

I was able to take this SFF PC apart and access the ports for M.2 SSDs and for the lower 2 memory slots without using a single hand tool. All the areas I needed to access, while covered with other components — fan housings, in fact — were easily accessed by releasing latches and swinging items out of the way. You can see this in the lead-in graphic for the NVMe fan housing.

I’ve worked on hundreds of PCs and laptops, including a dozen-plus SFF PCs. This particular model is nearly unique in making itself easy to work on and understand. Indeed, Lenovo has posted short videos that show how to access the chassis, M.2 drives,CPU fan, lower memory modules, and a whole bunch more. Combined, they made it dead easy for me to get things out of the way, and install/remove the components I was after.

The whole process took less than 2 minutes for each action (install NVMe, install 2 SO-DIMMs, remove 2 SO-DIMMs). It’s been an amazing trip so far.

Half-Way Benefits, with More to Come?

I’ve got the new NVMe drive working. I was able to create a full C: drive image backup — using Macrium Reflect X — on that new D: drive. Total time required: 00:37 (yes, that’s thirty-seven seconds, total, disk size of image: 45.57GB). SSD-to-SSD backup is definitely the way to go, and even better if — as is the case here — it’s from the primary (boot/system) internal SSD to a secondary internal SSD. Again: 37 seconds! Wow!!!

When the matching memory modules show up next week (I couldn’t get the PC to post using the G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR5 SO-DIMMs I ordered) I’ll try again. By ordering the same part number as what’s installed, I hope that the next try will succeed. Stay tuned: I’ll let you know.

Here in Windows-World, it’s always nice to find a great design that makes it easy to get in, add or remove components, then get out and back to work. Kudos to Lenovo for a truly magnificent design. I love it!!

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin
Hardware Reviews, Insider stuff, Recent Activity, WED Blog

Closing Thoughts ON Tecra A60-M2

2 Comments

Well, it’s been an interesting and pleasantly surprising ride. On August 18 — just about a month ago — Dynabook sent me a snazzy new Tecra A60M2, one of its Intel-based Copilot+ PCs. Initially, I was a bit put off by the unit’s mid-range CPU (Core Ultra 5 225U) and its modest RAM endowment (16 GB). If buying for myself, I usually go for i7 or i9 class CPUs, and 32 or 64 GB of RAM. But as my 30-dal eval period is ending, I find myself unexpectedly and favoraby impressed with this PC. Thus, here are my closing thoughs on Tecra A60-M2, as I get ready to box it up and ship it back.

Weighing Closing Thoughts on Tecra A60M2: Pros & Cons

All in all, the A60-M2 handled everything I threw at it, and was more than able to cope with my daily regimen of email, web surf and search, heavy Copilot use, and intense workouts for Word, PowerPoint and Excel. I was expecting some occasional fits and delays, but encountered nothing but smooth, reliable performance. This is an excellent business machine for productivity/office workers, if under-powered for developers, data scientists or AI model makers or testers.

PROs

The display is clear and legible, if a bit washed out in direct sun. The IR camera and fingerprint scanner are the best I’ve ever used: incredibly fast, and only occasionally required repositioning of face or finger. Aside from a handful of Dynabook utilities, mostly useful not nugatory, there’s zero bloatware on this laptop.

Despite its modest RAM config (a single 16GB DDR5-5600 SODIMM, in fact, with room for one more) it is user-ugradeable to 64 GB. That’s a big plus against many other Copilot+ PCs I’ve seen lately, all with soldered RAM. It’s Wi-Fi 7 wireless and TB4 USB-C ports (x2) do their jobs nicely. That said, USB-C attached NVMe is middle-of-the-road, too (somewhat above UASP, but not 2x or better).

CONs

Three of the four case surfaces excluding the top deck (made of magesium alloy) are plastic composites. The unit is strong and relatively rigid — it meets MIL-STD-810H durability requirements– but the top deck flexes quite a bit, and the upper surface is a fingerprint magnet. The 4-cell Li-ion polymer battery is rated at 60W, but the unit is power-hungry enough to give it a typical 6-8 hour life for normal workday tasks. I’m spoiled by double-digit SnapDragon X values of 11 or more hours, I admit. It also charges back up to 40-50% in 30-40 minutes using the co-supplied 65W USB-C charger. That goes a bit faster from a TB4/TB5 dock.

I have some others cons to report, but they’re more nitpicky than serious:

  • Touchpad is positioned left-of-center on the lower deck, and takes some getting used to. Works fine (and accurately), tho…
  • The display is Full HD (1920×1080 only) with no 2K or 4K upgrade options available.
  • Keyboard layout is idiosyncratic enough that a long-time Lenovo ThinkPad user like myself had to adjust touch typing techniques to get fully up to speed.
  • Device weighs in at 4.1 lbs (1.86kg) which makes it noticeably bigger and heavier than other Copilot+ models I’ve used, especially those of the SnapDragon X persuasion.

One more thing, this Dynabook model’s MSRP is $1,249 as configured (the 512GB PCIe Gen4 NVMe is the only major item I didn’t mention earlier). This runs from $250-639 more expensive than Lenovo’s ThinkBook and IdeaPad Snapdragon X models. Buyers must want the bigger screen and higher durability to make that extra cost worthwhile. But it’s a durable, hard-working, surprisingly capable beast, and sure to provide its users with years of computing satisfaction.

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin
Benchmarking, Copilot+ PCs, Hardware Reviews, Insider stuff, Recent Activity, WED Blog

Dynabook Tecra A60-M2 Intake

7 Comments

I guess Sharp/Dynabook must’ve liked my coverage of their Portege X40-M2 unit. Why say so? Because about 2 days after I sent that unit back, they sent me another more powerful laptop to look at. Today’s blog post describes my Dynabook Tecra A60-M intake experience (Model PNL21U-017004). It’s a bigger beast, but a little less sturdy (it’s got what feels like an all-plastic lower/keyboard deck) albeit with minimal flex. For the first time, ever, it comes with Windows 11 24H2 Enterprise loaded as well.

Describing Dynabook Tecra A60-M2 Intake Process

Again and suprisingly, Dynabook uses closed-cell plastic foam inserts to enshroud the unit in an otherwise all-cardboard set of nested shipping boxes. It comes with exactly two parts: the laptop itself and the power brick/power cord. Initial setup was absurdly easy. But, for some odd reason, Intel BE201 802.11 Wi-Fi 7 adapters won’t let me log into the 5GHz band on my Asus router. I have to use the 2.4 GHz band instead. If I need to go faster than that, I can plug my trusty StarTech GbE USB 3 adapter into one of its two 5 Gbps USB 3.2 version 1 ports.

It took me some time to get all the bits and pieces in place for my usual setup. I used Patch My PC Home Updater to bring in 7Zip, GadgetPack, CystalDisk mark & info, CPUID, Everything, Chrome, and more. Because this is an Intel-flavored Copilot+ PC, I also installed Intel Driver and Support Assistant as well, along with the Dynabook Support Utility to check for vendor UEFI, firmware, and driver updates.

A Clean, Clean, Clean Machine

I’ve got to say this is one of the cleanest review units I’ve ever gotten. It required very little by way of update or clean-up to bring entirely up to snuff. It’s also got the fastest and most accurate fingerprint scanner I’ve ever used (Device Manager identifies it as a FocalTech Electronics device). So far, it’s fast, has a nice 16″ display, and does everything I’ve asked it to in short order.

The Tecra A60-M2 Components, Listed

According to the vendor web page, this unit goes for US$1249 (MSRP). I don’t see any major discounts available online but it’s pretty new still, so they may be coming. Here’s what’s inside:

  • CPU: Intel Core Ultra 5 225U
  • OS: Windows 11 24H2 Enterprise (26100.4946)
  • 16.0″ WUXGA display (1920×1200)
  • 16 GB DDR5-5600 (Samsung)
  • 0.5TiB Samsung OEM PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD
  • Ports: 2xUSB4/TB4 USB-C ports, 2xUSB3.2 Gen 1 ports, HDMI, RJ-45 GbE, microSD, mini-RCA (headset) jack
  • 60 Wh Lithium polymer battery; 65W USB-C power brick

What it doesn’t have that I might want? Offhand, I’d say a Hello-capable IR camera, and a touch display. Other than those things, and a bigger SSD, it’s pretty well-equipped. What one gets for US1,250 for this unit isn’t at all bad.

All in all, I like it pretty well so far. I’ll report further as I spend a bit more time with it, and learn more about what it can and can’t do. I’m curious about its SSD speed, USB-C performance, and general processing oomph. Expect to hear more from me on all of those topics, soon. In the meantime, I’m having fun playing with this new toy.

 

 

Facebooklinkedin
Facebooklinkedin